Open Letter Maria supplicans – Fr. Jesusmary Missigbètò
OPEN LETTER
‘MARIA SUPPLICANS’
concerning the truth about Pope Francis and his moral and doctrinal errors
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
___________________
Open Letter ‘Maria supplicans’
concerning the truth about Pope Francis and his moral and doctrinal errors
Part 1 (introduction)
22 February 2024
Feast of the Chair of Saint Peter
Dear faithful Catholics throughout the world,
May Mary the Supplicant obtain for us from Jesus the strength and courage to publicly proclaim the truth about Pope Francis and his moral and doctrinal errors! As Our Lady of Anguera said, many cardinals, bishops and priests are afraid to tell you this truth: “Dear children... Many chosen to defend the truth will retreat out of fear” (4.908, 1 January 2020). We saw this recently with the publication of the Declaration ‘Fiducia supplicans’. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (18 December 2023) did not dare to say that Pope Francis, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández (Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith) and Father Armando Matteo (Secretary), had committed a serious error by publishing this declaration. The same goes for the Bishops’ Conference of France (10 January 2024). The same goes also for Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo (11 January 2024), who stated that homosexual couples cannot be blessed in Africa, without saying that this is also morally unacceptable throughout the Church. However, Jesus and Mary call us to preach the truth without fear: “My Jesus needs your public and courageous testimony” (4.908, 1 January 2020); “My Jesus needs men and women of courage so that, following the example of John the Baptist, they may announce the Gospel and defend his Church” (5.109, 8 April 2021).
We are in Lent, a time dedicated to prayer, fasting and mercy. Due to my love for Pope Francis and his eternal salvation, I recently encouraged Christians to offer God forty days of prayer and fasting for Francis’ total conversion to the truth. As an act of mercy, I would now like to encourage all Christians to publicly criticise Pope Francis’ moral and doctrinal errors which, through relativism and situation ethics, attack marriage, the family and the Sacraments. Why is such criticism necessary? It is because of Francis’ obstinacy in maintaining his errors and continuing to teach them. Since 2016, already 8 years, he has refused to rectify his errors despite the evidence and the many fraternal and filial corrections from his daughters and sons (university professors, experts in Theology, Morality and Canon Law) who have invited him to do so (cf. Open Letter to the College of Cardinals, 29 June 2016, 45 signatories; Filial Correction to Pope Francis, 16 July 2017, 62 signatories; Open Letter to the Bishops, April 2019, 20 signatories; Declaration ‘Vírgen Santísima de Guadalupe, Mater Veritatis Salutaris’, 12 December 2021, 58 signatories; my filial correction, 29 June 2023; Filial Appeal to all the Cardinals and Bishops of the Catholic Church, 2 February 2024, 92 signatories; etc.). Public criticism is also necessary to lead to the truth those Christians who are still in the dark about Francis’ errors.
This public criticism is in fact a filial correction addressed by the sons and daughters of the Church to Pope Francis, and will help him to quickly correct his errors. Jesus himself encourages us to do so: “If your brother sins, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone... If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you... If he refuses to listen to them, tell the Church” (Matthew 18:15-17). Christian Tradition has also praised the courage of St. Paul and the humility of St. Peter during the public filial correction in Antioch: “when Kephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face because he clearly was wrong” (Galatians 2:11). St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas too recall the need for public filial correction: “if there were any danger to the faith, superiors would have to be rebuked by inferiors, even in public... Augustine’s Glosis explains: ‘Peter himself shows by his example to those who have the pre-eminence, if it happened to them to deviate from the right path, not to refuse to be corrected, even by their inferiors.’” (Summa Theologica II-II, q.33, a.4). God the Father also reminded St. Catherine of Siena of the charitable obligation of public fraternal and filial correction: “if he persists in not correcting himself... you can... let it be known to the Mystical Body of the Holy Church” (Dialogo della Divina Provvidenza, Tractato dell’orazione, Capitolo 105).
Dear faithful Catholics, today, 22 February 2024, Feast of the Chair of Saint Peter, I would like, with humility and respect, to tell you the truth about the one who is currently sitting in this chair, because he is not who you believe him to be. Indeed, many Christians, blinded by their love for Pope Francis, have stopped using their intelligence and believe that he is a faithful successor to St. Peter. But the reality is quite different (this is painful to say but I must say it): Pope Francis is a heretic, a false doctor, a false pastor, a false prophet, a false pope, a new Judas, a new Martin Luther, a new devil and is probably a member of ecclesiastical masonry or is influenced by ecclesiastics who are members of it. Obviously, what has just been said is shocking and surprising for those who do not yet know the truth about Pope Francis. However, the following lines will confirm this truth. The introductory part of this open letter is published in the first week of Lent. In the second week, the second part will be shared and will give proof of Francis’ heresies. In the third week, I will explain why Pope Francis is a false doctor, a false pastor and a false prophet. Then, in the fourth week of Lent, I will show why Francis is a false pope. The fifth week will offer a text revealing how Francis today plays the same role as Judas, Martin Luther and the devil. And finally, in the sixth week of Lent, we will see the reasons why Francis is probably a member of ecclesiastical masonry or is influenced by ecclesiastics who are members of it.
Why am I so sure of being telling you the truth? Firstly, because this truth is based clearly and unambiguously on the words and actions of Francis, which any intellectually honest Christian can verify. Secondly, because since I began to speak publicly about Francis’ moral and doctrinal errors (21 November 2020), I have received five death threats and more than twenty acts of intimidation (messages containing veiled threats from unknown people, shadowing and chasing in the streets, etc.). Finally, because for the past two years, social network X (Twitter) has been restricting the promotion and distribution of my publications by imposing unfair restrictions on my accounts @fatherjesusmary, @janviergbenou and @fatherjbyesno. For example, on numerous occasions, without notice or explanation, my accounts were inactive or, when I accessed them, I could not make a tweet in my profile because the button allowing me to do so was inactive. All the images I publish are automatically masked with the words ‘sensitive content’, even though they are often pious images of Jesus, Mary and the saints. Despite my complaints and my ‘X Premium’ subscription, these unfair restrictions have not stopped. At present, the ‘X Premium’ subscription option has been removed from my accounts. This is all very strange because the total number of followers on my three accounts is only 3,000. Why is X (Twitter) treating me so unfairly if it is not because I am telling the truth? What deal has X (Twitter) made with the Vatican to silence the truth? Has Elon Musk @elonmusk, the owner of X (Twitter), not publicly declared that he is in favour of free speech?
As I conclude the first part of this open letter, what advice would I give to Catholics who have just read it? Firstly, do not trust Pope Francis because he is leading you down a path that is the opposite of God’s path. Secondly, pray that the Lord will give Francis the grace during this Lenten season to recognise his errors and correct them. Thirdly, do not leave the Catholic Church, for it does not belong to Francis but to Jesus Christ, who has promised to be always present in the Barque of Saint Peter: “I am with you always, until the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20).
Your African brother, Fr. Janvier Gbénou
Pen name: Fr. Jesusmary Missigbètò
fatherjmm@gmail.com
@fatherjesusmary: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Truth, Threads, Instagram, TikTok, SoundCloud
___________________
Open Letter ‘Maria supplicans’
concerning the truth about Pope Francis and his moral and doctrinal errors
Part 2 (heretic)
27 February 2024
Memorial of Saint Gregory of Narek
Dear faithful Catholics throughout the world,
By the intercession of St. Gregory of Narek, may God bless us all and help us to emerge quickly from the crisis of truth that our Church is currently experiencing, one of the main causes of which is the confusion created by the moral and doctrinal errors of Pope Francis! Many Christians were shocked and surprised by the first part of this open letter that I published last week, because it contained some daring accusations about Francis. But, in reality, this is because they do not know how serious are the errors that Francis has introduced into the traditional teaching of the Church and how great the damages caused by these errors. It is therefore necessary, in this second week of Lent, to give them the proof of the first accusation: “Pope Francis is a heretic”. Various theologians have already explained this in great detail (cf. Filial Correction to Pope Francis, 16 July 2017; Open Letter to Bishops, April 2019; Declaration ‘Vírgen Santísima de Guadalupe, Mater Veritatis Salutaris’, 12 December 2021; Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris laetitia”, Tullio Rotondo, March 2022; Manifiesto para reivindicar la doctrina católica, Francisco José Vegara Cerezo, 19 February 2023; etc.). Personally, I did so in the seven open letters I published between 21 October 2021 and 15 August 2023. Francis’ heresies are material (words and actions) but his obstinacy in maintaining them for 8 years obliges to note that they are also formal (voluntary). Let us pray that the College of Cardinals and the College of Bishops will take a serious look at the problem and have the courage to draw all the consequences. Indeed, it is absolutely necessary for all the Catholic faithful to be well informed about the heresies of Francis described briefly here...
1. “Amoris laetitia” (or the Confession and Eucharist given without repentance for grave sins): On 19 March 2016, referring to remarried divorced persons, Francis stated that “in such situations, many people, knowing and accepting the possibility of living ‘as brothers and sisters’ which the Church offers them, point out that if certain expressions of intimacy are lacking, ‘it often happens that faithfulness is endangered and the good of the children suffers’” (Amoris laetitia, note 329). On 5 September 2016, together with the bishops of the Pastoral Region of Buenos Aires, he affirmed that “the commitment to live in continence can be proposed. Amoris laetitia does not ignore the difficulties of this option... the mentioned option may not, in fact, be feasible”. On 5 June 2017, he ordered that these three sentences be published as “Magisterium authenticum” (Acta Apostolicae Sedis 108; pp. 1071-1074; www.vatican.va/archive/aas/documents/2016/acta-ottobre2016.pdf). When have we seen a pope affirm that the virtue of chastity is an option, and present fidelity and the good of children as excuses for committing adultery or fornication (intrinsically and morally evil acts), and further affirm that all this is authentic magisterium (true teaching)? Never (cf. my 2nd open letter, 8 December 2021). All this implies eight heresies: rejection of the universality of the Sixth Commandment; rejection of the universality of the Ninth Commandment; rejection of the divine law reserving sexual activity to the married man and woman; rejection of the divine law reserving sexual desire to the married man and woman; rejection of the gravity of adultery and fornication; rejection of the gravity of the desire for adultery and fornication ; rejection of the need to struggle to avoid sexual activity with a person with whom one is not married, an absolutely necessary condition for access to the Sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist; rejection of the need to struggle to avoid sexually desiring a person with whom one is not married, an absolutely necessary condition for access to the Sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist.
2. The new hysterectomy of 2018 (or the first anti-natalist measure of the Catholic Church and the first error of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith): Is it morally right to perform a hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) when the condition of the uterus poses no present or future danger to the health of a fertile woman who has sexual relations? Can we tell a fertile woman who has sexual relations that she has the right to have her healthy uterus removed simply because all her children die before birth? Christian Tradition has always answered NO to these two questions. Unfortunately, on 10 December 2018, together with Cardinal Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer SJ (Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) and Archbishop Giacomo Morandi (Secretary), Pope Francis answered YES, thereby accepting direct sterilisation, an intrinsically and morally evil act (cf. Humanae vitae 14; Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 31 July 1993). This is the first anti-natalist measure of the Catholic Church and is taught today in Catholic universities and practised in Catholic hospitals (cf. my 3rd open letter, 25 March 2022). It is also the first error of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This implies two heresies: rejection of the divine law forbidding making sexual activity infertile; rejection of the necessity of confessing a gravely immoral act, an absolutely necessary condition for access to the Sacrament of the Eucharist.
3. The heresy against the Immaculate Conception and the sanctity of the Virgin Mary (or the heresy most clearly expressed but surprisingly forgotten by cardinals and bishops): Francis’ most blatant heresy is that of 21 December 2018, when he said: “Our Lady and Saint Joseph are full of joy... Yes, but let us not think that it was easy for them: one is not born a saint, one becomes one, and this also applies to them” (Address to employees of the Holy See and the Vatican City State on the occasion of Christmas greetings). By asserting that Mary was not born a saint, Francis has contradicted the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, solemnly proclaimed by Blessed Pope Pius IX : “by the authority of Jesus Christ Our Lord, of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own, we declare, pronounce, and define that the doctrine which holds that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, in the first instance of her conception... was preserved free from all stain of original sin, is revealed by God and therefore to be believed firmly and constantly by all the faithful” (Apostolic Constitution Ineffabilis Deus, 8 December 1854).
4. The Abu Dhabi Declaration (or the denial of Christianity as the definitive religion willed by God for all mankind): On 4 February 2019, in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), together with Ahmed el-Tayeb, Imam of Al-Azhar, Pope Francis signed a declaration on human brotherhood containing the following sentence: “The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, gender, race and language are a wise divine will, by which God created human beings”. He thus attributed to God’s positive will the existence of religions that practise evil (idolatry, human sacrifice, sacred prostitution, etc.). But this is a doctrinal error because evil (sin) cannot be attributed to the divine will (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica I, q.17, a.1; q.19, a.9-10; q.48, a.6; q.49, a.2). This sentence also denies the specificity of Christianity as the definitive religion willed by God for all humanity (cf. John 14:6; Dominus Iesus 13) and cancels out the Christian duty to evangelise the world (cf. Matthew 28:18-20). This implies three heresies: rejection of the goodness of the divine will; rejection of the uniqueness of the saving mission of Jesus Christ; rejection of the missionary mandate of Jesus Christ. This sentence therefore accepts a religious relativism that puts all religions on the same level, as can be seen in Francis’ participation in the idolatrous acts with the Pachamama at the Vatican on 4 October 2019 (cf. my 5th open letter, 29 June 2022), and with the autochthons of Canada on 25 and 27 July 2022. There is heresy here: rejection of the First Commandment.
5. The homosexual cohabitation laws (or the opposition to St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI): On 21 October 2020, 15 September 2021, 5 February 2023 and 10-11 March 2023, Francis publicly called for the adoption of homosexual civil cohabitation laws. When have we seen a pope ask humanity to adopt such laws? Never (cf. my 1st open letter, 21 October 2021). Moreover, Pope St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI relied on the Bible and the traditional magisterium of the popes to remind us that all Christians must express their “absolute personal opposition” to these laws, otherwise they are committing a “gravely immoral” act (Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 3 June 2003, 10). So we have six heresies: rejection of the divine law reserving sexual activity to the married man and woman; rejection of the divine law reserving sexual desire to the married man and woman; rejection of the gravity of homosexual activity; rejection of the gravity of homosexual desire ; rejection of the need to struggle to avoid sexual activity with a person of the same sex, an absolutely necessary condition for access to the Sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist; rejection of the need to struggle to avoid sexually desiring a person of the same sex, an absolutely necessary condition for access to the Sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist.
6. The blessing of homosexual couples (or the desacralisation of the Christian blessing): Is it morally right for a priest to bless a homosexual couple? Christian Tradition has always answered NO. On 22 February 2021, Pope Francis himself, along with Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishop Morandi, answered NO, in a document from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Strangely enough, on 11 July 2023 and 18 December 2023, Francis contradicted himself by finally accepting this blessing, with the help of Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández and Father Armando Matteo. He thus brought shame and mockery on the Catholic Church, since even pagan religions do not give such a blessing. Unfortunately, as Cardinal Mauro Gambetti said (11 January 2024), this blessing is now possible in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome. What a great scandal! This implies the same heresies mentioned for homosexual cohabitation laws and, in addition, the rejection of the Second Commandment.
7. The Eucharist given without the need for repentance to publicly pro-abortion Catholic politicians (or the opposition to Christian Tradition and St. Thomas Aquinas): On 15 September 2021, on the pretext that “Communion is not a prize for the perfect” (press conference on return from the trip to Slovakia), Francis authorised all publicly pro-abortion Catholic politicians to receive the Holy Eucharist without the need for them to reject their attachment to abortion (cf. my 4th open letter, 31 May 2022). Yet St. Thomas Aquinas clearly recalled the traditional teaching of the Church: “Public sinners must not be given Holy Communion, even if they ask for it” (Summa Theologica III, q.80, a.6). So we have two heresies: rejection of the need to confess the grave sin of cooperating in abortion, an absolutely necessary condition for access to the Sacrament of the Eucharist; rejection of the gravity of abortion.
8. The empty hell (or the opposition to Jesus Christ): On 14 January 2024, on Italian television, Francis said: “I like to think of hell as empty”. Does he have the right to have such a thought? Yes, and no one can stop him. Does he have the right to make it public? No, because it contradicts Jesus Christ, the Bible and the traditional teaching of the Church, and destroys the desire for holiness in the human heart. In fact, due to the irrevocable nature of their will, it is impossible for the devil, demons and damned men to be in Heaven (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1033-1037; St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica I, q.64; St. Catherine of Siena, Dialogo della Divina Provvidenza, Tractato de la discrezione, Capitolo 40). Furthermore, Jesus clearly taught that hell is an “eternal fire” and that it is not empty (cf. Matthew 7:13-14; 22:11-14; 25:41-46; Luke 13:23-28; 16:22-26; John 17:12). There is heresy here: rejection of the doctrine on the eternal condemnation of fallen angels and men dying without repentance in grave sin.
What to say after the above facts? Pope Francis’ canonical infractions are numerous and include several heresies attacking marriage, the family and the Sacraments, through relativism and situation ethics (cf. my 6th open letter, 16 July 2023; my 7th open letter, 15 August 2023). By the preceding errors, he has acted against canons 212§1, 276§1, 598§2, 705, 749, 750§1, 751, 752, 915, 916, 1347§2, 1364, 1365, 1368 and 1391. Let us dwell particularly on canon 1364: “a heretic... incurs a latae sententiae excommunication... If a long-standing contempt or the gravity of scandal calls for it... dismissal from the clerical state”. Let us add canon 1365: “A person who... teaches a doctrine condemned by the Roman Pontiff, or by an Ecumenical Council, or obstinately rejects the teaching mentioned in canon 750 § 2 or canon 752... is to be punished with a censure and deprivation of office”. Who can dismiss Francis from the clerical state since he is officially pope? However, this does not prevent the College of Cardinals and the College of Bishops from studying his situation and making him a public filial correction, since before obeying a pope who orders sin, one must obey God and his law (cf. Acts 5:29). Can they choose a new pope seeing that Francis has placed himself outside the communion of the Church due to the many heresies he has refused to rectify over the last 8 years? Francisco Suárez (1548-1617), one of the greatest theologians of the Society of Jesus, is totally in favour (cf. James Vincent Schall SJ and Robert J. Siscoe, The Remnant, 18 November 2014). Finally, canon 1391: “The following are to be punished... a person who, in a public ecclesiastical document, asserts something false”. Pope Francis has asserted the false in three public ecclesiastical documents: Amoris laetitia (2016), Hysterectomy (2018), Fiducia supplicans (2023). Does he not deserve to be punished, along with Cardinals Ladaria and Fernández, Archbishop Morandi and Father Matteo, since he has used several public ecclesiastical documents to affirm the false and seriously lead all Christians into error? In next week’s letter, I will explain why Pope Francis is a false doctor, a false pastor and a false prophet.
Your African brother, Fr. Janvier Gbénou
Pen name: Fr. Jesusmary Missigbètò
fatherjmm@gmail.com
@fatherjesusmary: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Truth, Threads, Instagram, TikTok, SoundCloud
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
Open Letter ‘Maria supplicans’
concerning the truth about Pope Francis and his moral and doctrinal errors
Part 6 (ecclesiastical masonry)
29 March 2024
Good Friday
Dear faithful Catholics throughout the world,
This letter is the last in a series of six dedicated to explaining Pope Francis’ moral and doctrinal errors and their logical implications. After analysing why Pope Francis is a heretic, a false doctor, a false pastor, a false prophet, a false pope, a new Judas, a new Martin Luther, a new devil, we finally need to see why Francis is probably a member of ecclesiastical Masonry or is influenced by ecclesiastics who are members.
1. The Catholic Church and ecclesiastical Masonry
There is no doubt that for many centuries there has been a Masonic project to control the Catholic Church and divert it from its mission of saving the world. St. Maximilian Kolbe gives an interesting account of this in the notes he took during his stay in Rome. In 1917, he saw several blasphemous Masonic processions shouting songs in honour of Satan, and leaflets were distributed in Saint Peter’s Square reading: “Satan must reign in the Vatican and the Pope must be his servant” [1]. On 14 November 2007, Our Lady of Anguera said: “The day will come when perverse men will occupy privileged space in the House of the Lord. It will be these who will draw into the Church the one who opposes Christ. It will be the time when the Sacred will be cast out and the faithful will be persecuted. Few will remain steadfast in the faith, but through these few, God will bring forth great hope for his people” (2.916). Who is Our Lady of Anguera talking about? Many analysts think it is about ecclesiastical Masonry, i.e. priests, bishops and cardinals who outwardly give the impression of being with Jesus but are in reality his enemies, since they pervert the Christian life by encouraging immoral behaviour, errors in the traditional teaching of the Church and the promotion of their fellow men to important positions in the Church. What is their greatest ambition? To install at the top of the Church a pope who helps to ‘masonicise’ the Church, i.e. to put the Church at the service of the aspirations of Masonry in this world.
Is Francis opposed to Christ (Truth)? Yes, of course. Parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of this open letter have given proof of this by presenting and explaining his moral and doctrinal errors. In addition, his obstinate refusal to rectify his errors since 2016 leads us to believe that he wants to leave them as seeds that will install spiritual lukewarmness among Christians and slowly destroy the Catholic Church from within, which would be precisely an objective of ecclesiastical Masonry [1]. Does Francis have anything to do with the phrase “the Sacred will be cast out and the faithful will be persecuted”? Some analysts see in this the motu propio Traditionis custodes (16 July 2021) which, in the universal Church, has unleashed a veritable persecution of the traditional Mass and of the faithful who celebrate it, and is gradually causing the celebration of this Mass to disappear in all modern churches. Is it really legitimate to think that Masonry finally has ‘its pope’ in the person of Francis? The answer seems to be “yes”, because by emphasising mercy, he has discreetly and cunningly inserted Masonic principles [2] into the traditional teaching of the Church, unbeknownst to the vast majority of Christians. Here is the proof...
2. Pope Francis is probably a member of ecclesiastical Masonry or is influenced by ecclesiastics who are members
Masonry is spreading the idea of universal brotherhood united with a relativistic mentality, Francis too. With the Abu Dhabi Declaration or Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together (4 February 2019) and the Encyclical Fratelli tutti on fraternity and social friendship (3 October 2020), the Argentine Pope has called for universal human fraternity. This first aspect is not opposed to the Christian faith, since all human beings are brothers and sisters and therefore children of the same God. The problem is the second aspect: relativism. This is very characteristic of Masonry. In concrete terms, it implies a situational ethic and the primacy of individual conscience over the moral law. On various occasions, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger has emphasised the relativistic nature of Masonry and its incompatibility with Christianity: “Even if it is stated that relativism is not assumed as dogma, nevertheless there is really proposed a relativistic symbolic concept... firm adherence to the truth of God, revealed in the Church, becomes simple membership, in an institution, considered as a particular expressive form alongside other expressive forms, more or less just as possible and valid, of man’s turning toward the eternal. The temptation to go in this direction is much stronger today, inasmuch as it corresponds fully to certain convictions prevalent in contemporary mentality. The opinion that truth cannot be known is a typical characteristic of our era and, at the same time, an essential element in its general crisis” [3]. Samuël Tomei explains, in an excellent article, the link that Pope Benedict XVI has established between Masonry and relativism [4].
In the intellectual field, Masonry inherits the Enlightenment and stipulates that no person, society or religion can claim to know or possess the truth about the world or a supra-sensible being, which implies a pluralism of conceptions, all equally valid. In the field of sexuality, Masonry accepts a pluralism of sexualities and therefore transsexuality, homosexuality and homosexual cohabitation laws, a concept of love that considers homosexual affectivity to be equal to heterosexual love, a concept of marriage and family that considers the common life of homosexual persons to be equal to the homes of heterosexual couples. In the field of life, Masonry accepts a pluralism of free choices authorising euthanasia, abortion, artificial insemination, surrogate motherhood, birth control and anti-natalist measures such as contraception. In the field of religions, Masonry accepts a religious pluralism which considers that no religion can affirm that it possesses a supernatural truth or claim that it must be followed by all humanity. Unfortunately, Masonic relativism has been imported into the Catholic Church through ecclesiastical Masonry and affects the understanding and celebration of the Christian sacraments. Baptism is no longer considered necessary for salvation. Consequently, the traditional “extra Ecclesiam nulla salus” is rejected, while Jesus’ missionary mandate is minimised or even cancelled. Good proselytism, respectful of freedom and proposing Christianity as the definitive religion willed by God for all mankind, is then considered disrespectful and bad. Christianity is seen and presented as one religion among others, and it must not be said that it has a universal vocation. As far as the Sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist are concerned, ecclesiastical Masonry removes all the legitimate restrictions that the Church traditionally places on access to them (conversion and penance for Confession, a state of grace for the Eucharist) and, by relying on individual conscience, allows anyone, even unbaptized, to receive these sacraments if he so wish.
Strangely enough, all these relativistic principles are perfectly reflected in the main errors of Francis’ magisterium. Where do we see more relativism and situation ethics in Francis? In Amoris laetitia (19 March 2016) and in the letter of the Argentinian bishops (5 September 2016) validated by Francis and published as “magisterium authenticum” (5 June 2017). Several university professors and experts in History, Theology, Morality and Canon Law have written filial corrections in which they have collected the relativistic phrases of Francis contained in these two documents [5]. Let us now study Bergoglio’s other reforms...
The hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) that Francis adopted on 10 December 2018, together with Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishop Morandi, constitutes the first anti-natalist measure of the Catholic Church and the first error of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Unfortunately, by insisting on the expression “spontaneous abortion”, this new hysterectomy has been presented to Christians in such a cunning way that many do not realise its gravity. According to Francis, Ladaria and Morandi, the desire to avoid spontaneous abortion implies that a fertile woman who has sexual relations can have her uterus removed when there is no present or future danger to her health and when a group of medical experts certify that all her children will die before birth. Let us remember that spontaneous abortion is a natural death, and therefore not imputable to the woman as a moral fault. Let us also remember that, by nature, all human beings are mortal, and therefore the children of all women in the world past, present and future are necessarily mortal either before or after birth. So we will not fall into the situation ethics of Francis, Ladaria and Morandi and we will not accept an immoral hysterectomy, which is in reality a direct sterilisation prohibited by divine laws [6].
On 21 December 2018, by saying that “one is not born a saint, one becomes one, and this also applies” to “Our Lady”, Francis relativised Mary’s original sanctity. On 4 February 2019, by affirming that “the pluralism and the diversity of religions... are a wise divine will”, Francis expressed his religious relativism, which denies the specificity of Christianity as the definitive religion willed by God for all humanity [7] and minimises or cancels out the Christian duty of evangelising the world. Here we can recall the many statements in which Francis rejects all proselytism without specifying that we should not reject good proselytism, which respects the freedom of individuals and offers Christianity to everyone by following the missionary mandate of Jesus Christ: “Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” [8].
Francis’ sexual relativism, discreetly attacking marriage and the family, can be appreciated in his zeal for homosexual cohabitation laws, of which he has become the international apostle, given his numerous interventions in favour of these laws, for which St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI had asked Christians to show their “absolute personal opposition” otherwise they would be committing a “gravely immoral” [9] act. On 21 October 2020, speaking of homosexual persons, Francis said: “what we have to do is a civil coexistence law”. On 15 September 2021, 5 February 2023, 10-11 March 2023, and even more recently, on 19 March 2024, he returned to the same idea, encouraging humanity to adopt this kind of law. Francis’ sexual relativism also came to the fore when he asked priests to perform “blessings for couples in irregular situations and for couples of the same sex” (18 December 2023), couples which in reality are based on adultery, fornication or sodomy. This sexual relativism can also be seen when Francis establishes equality between homosexual affectivity and heterosexual love by saying of homosexual persons living together: “I bless two persons who love each other” (8 February 2024); “they live the gift of love” (19 March 2024). It is really a pity that Francis does not ask himself a very simple and obvious question: “How do they love each other?” The truth is that what he calls “love” is neither a love nor a gift from God but an affective disorder. In fact, it is a sexual desire and a sexual practice that do not conform to God’s will and are different from the noble love of friendship, which desires the good of others and necessarily refuses to subject them to an unnatural sexual practice.
The relativism of Francis in the access to the sacraments and the indirect promotion of abortion can be observed. First, with Alberto Fernández, a remarried divorcee and pro-abortion former president of Argentina, who met him at the Vatican and who, with his partner Fabiola Yáñez, received the Holy Eucharist there in a Mass celebrated by Bishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo (31 January 2020). Later, Francis authorised Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to receive the Holy Eucharist without having to reject their commitment to abortion (15 September 2021, 9 October 2021, 29 October 2021). Let us also not forget that the number of times Francis preaches mercy without mentioning conversion and repentance is incalculable. He often repeats “in the Church, there is room for everyone, everyone, everyone”, referring to the parable of the wedding feast of the king’s son, but he usually does not speak about the conclusion of this parable, which requires conversion and repentance [10]. Francis’ mercy is therefore false because it is incomplete and constitutes a half-truth that is different from the mercy of Jesus [11].
Two elements need to be considered before concluding this analysis, as they raise legitimate questions. The first is the fact that, since 1999, Francis is an honorary member of the Rotary Club, usually considered close to Masonic lodges. Why such a membership when the Church has expressly forbidden it to ecclesiastics since 1951? [12] Here is the second element: in a television show (‘La Mirada’ by Roberto García, Canal 26, 27 November 2017), Ambassador Juan Bautista Yofre (Tata) recalled that an Argentine television station (La Nación) had published a telephone call in which the head of Vatican intelligence in Argentina claimed that he and Francis are members of Masonry [13]. Since this information was made public to all Argentinians, why did neither Francis nor the Vatican deny it if it was false? Why did not they take legal action against ‘La Nación’ or Ambassador Yofre for defamation? The current subject is a sensitive one because it has important consequences. As all Christians have the right to know the truth, it is up to the College of Cardinals and the College of Bishops to confirm to them that relativism and the situation ethic have indeed been inserted into the traditional teaching of the Church and to what extent ecclesiastical Masonry has contributed to this. Will these colleges have the courage to investigate? In fact, membership of Masonry by a Catholic is prohibited and sanctioned by excommunication [14]. Some analysts believe that the recent reminder of this prohibition and sanction, through an official response from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (13 November 2023), as well as the Vatican’s rejection of a new Lebanese Masonic ambassador (October 2017), could help to silence the suspicions hanging over Pope Francis and Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández.
Anyway, the convergence between the errors of Francis and the aspirations of ecclesiastical Masonry is incontestable. To deny this reality is, in the beautiful words of Cardinal Joseph Zen, “truly an offense to our intelligence”. What is the cause of this astonishing convergence? Why does the magisterium of the relativist pope implement the Masonic ideal in the Catholic Church today? From a scientific point of view, there are only three possible hypotheses: either it is a pure coincidence of two erroneous visions that have met today and see their similarities, or Francis is a member of ecclesiastical Masonry and has simply fulfilled the mission of his association, or Francis has been unknowingly influenced by ecclesiastics who are members of Masonry. It is quite possible that Pope Francis and the Vatican do not agree with the above statements. But in this case, it would be good for them to explain to the Christian People what other hypothesis could justify the convergence between Francis’ errors and the ideals of ecclesiastical Masonry, since this convergence is scientifically undeniable for any intellectually honest theologian. On the other hand, let us remember that the Catholic Church has enemies, but loves everyone, following the advice of her Divine Founder [15]. Let us therefore pray for the members of Masonry, that they may have the grace to abandon relativism and experience the happiness of being totally Christian: “Only Jesus Christ is, in fact, the Teacher of Truth, and only in him can Christians find the light and the strength to live according to God’s plan, working for the true good of their brethren” [16]. Finally, let us thank the Lord for having given us the strength to live this Lenten season by offering him forty days of prayer and fasting for Francis’ total conversion to the truth.
Your African brother, Fr. Janvier Gbénou
Pen name: Fr. Jesusmary Missigbètò
fatherjmm@gmail.com
@fatherjesusmary: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Truth, Threads, Instagram, TikTok, SoundCloud
[1] https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/a-saint-who-fought-the-freemasons-has-the-battle-plan-against-todays-dictatorship/
[2] Cf. Taylor Marshall, Infiltration: the plot to destroy the Church from within, Crisis Publications, 2019
[3] Cf. Claude Delbos, Humanisme 2013/3, n° 300, pp. 45-51
[4] Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 11 March 1985
[5] Cf. Humanisme 2013/2, n° 299, pp. 94-97
[6] Cf. Open Letter to the College of Cardinals, 29 June 2016, 45 signatories; Filial Correction to Pope Francis, 16 July 2017, 62 signatories; Open Letter to the Bishops, April 2019, 20 signatories; etc.
[7] Cf. my 3rd open letter, 25 March 2022
[8] Cf. John 14:6; Declaration Dominus Iesus 13, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 6 August 2000
[9] Matthew 28:19-20
[10] Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 3 June 2003, 10
[11] “when the king came in to meet the guests he saw a man there not dressed in a wedding garment. He said to him, ‘My friend, how is it that you came in here without a wedding garment?’ But he was reduced to silence. Then the king said to his attendants, ‘Bind his hands and feet, and cast him into the darkness outside, where there will be wailing and grinding of teeth.’ Many are invited, but few are chosen.” (Matthew 22:11-14)
[12] “This is the time of fulfillment. The kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel.” (Mark 1:15); “I have not come to call the righteous to repentance but sinners.” (Luke 5:32); “Neither do I condemn you. Go, and from now on do not sin any more.” (John 8:11)
[13] Cf. Decree of the Holy Office, 11 January 1951
[14] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6EdvEeIzWI, the information appears at minute 27:40
[15] Cf. Encyclical Humanum genus, Pope Leo XIII, 20 April 1884; Code of Canon Law 1917, canon 2335; Documents of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 17 February 1981, 26 November 1983, 11 March 1985
[16] “love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44)
[17] Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 11 March 1985
Fr. Jesusmary Missigbètò
fatherjmm@gmail.com
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire